Completeness
Check for subscriber identifiers, active behavioral health benefit, rendering NPI/taxonomy, license type, supervision, diagnosis, procedure, pointer, treatment plan, time, modality, patient location, and prior auth where required.
Foresight helps behavioral health groups separate therapy, psychiatry, testing, medication management, collaborative care, and telehealth billing rules so claims match the provider type and documented service.
Mental health revenue leakage often looks simple until the payer checks provider taxonomy, license type, telehealth place of service, time documentation, psychotherapy add-ons, testing supervision, or collaborative-care consent and registry requirements.
Classify the encounter from documentation before charge release instead of relying on appointment type alone.
Check provider-specific payer rules so a therapy claim is not sent under a medical taxonomy or an E/M claim under a non-E/M eligible clinician.
Validate time, modality, diagnosis, treatment plan, and add-on-code evidence before claim submission.
Route denials by root cause: credentialing, authorization, modifier/POS, diagnosis-service mismatch, or documentation.
Foresight checks whether required evidence is present, whether records contradict each other, and whether the available facts look approvable under payer criteria before submission.
Check for subscriber identifiers, active behavioral health benefit, rendering NPI/taxonomy, license type, supervision, diagnosis, procedure, pointer, treatment plan, time, modality, patient location, and prior auth where required.
Catch appointment-type and note mismatches such as therapy booked but E/M documented, 90837 with only 45 minutes, add-on psychotherapy without a primary E/M service, or telehealth POS/modifier rules copied from another payer.
Apply payer carve-outs, visit limits, credentialing constraints, telehealth rules, testing-supervision requirements, and CoCM/BHI consent, registry, consultant-review, and monthly-minute thresholds before claim release.
A useful audit scores concrete workflow gaps: missing evidence, contradictory records, payer criteria risk, and follow-through after submission.
Whether the claim, PA, or appeal has the basic identifiers and clinical anchors needed before work leaves the queue.
Where the EHR, notes, questionnaire, inventory, pharmacy response, and billing record point to different answers.
Whether the available evidence appears to satisfy payer criteria before the submission creates AR or appeal work.
Whether approvals, denials, paper EOBs, portal messages, corrected claims, and deposits resolve cleanly after submission.